Motor Vehicles Act, 1988–Sec. 166–Dismissal of Claim Petition–Claimants were under the obligation to establish that the accident was occurred by the alleged vehicle and its driver was negligent–Both the witnesses are not the eye-witnesses of incident–It is not established the R was the third person who was driving the vehicle–Evaluation of evidence shows that K and N were the riders on the motor-cycle at the time of accident–It also seems that R was falsely impleaded by the claimants for the purpose of getting compensation–Held, no case is made out for interference.
