Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 302 & 323–Acquittal from the offence–Observation of Trial Court that the statements of PW 1, PW 9, and PW 11 were not consistent with the prosecution story–PW 3 and PW 11 were not the witnesses who were referred in FIR–Doctor admitted that the injury found on the forehead could be caused due to fall on the surface–No evidence to show that the deceased was attacked with such considerable force that would have broken the ribs and caused the rupture of spleen–Prosecution evidence contains more chaff than grain–Held, acquittal was justified.
