Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955–Secs. 88 & 183–Suit for declaration and eviction–Decreed by trial Court–Findings were upheld till BOR–Appreciation of–Land was sold to respondent-plaintiffs through regd. sale deed–Possession was handed over to them–Seller of land did not challenge the sale during his life time–No evidence was produced to show that he sold the land in intoxication–Sufficient evidence on record to conclude that the land was cultivated and in possession of respondent-plaintiff’s in Svt. 2032–Finding of fact that they were dispossessed just prior to filing the suit is neither capricious nor perverse–Further, the suit was not barred by limitation–Held, impugned judgment of BOR deserves to be confirmed.
