Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973–Secs. 220 & 184–Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 376, 504 & 506–As per the case of the appellant-complainant, after her engagement with the respondent, the offence of sexual intercourse against her will was committed between 21.02.2016 to 24.02.2016 at Delhi–Thereafter, on 23.03.2016 she visited Delhi and accused made the physical relationship twice with her consent–In November 2016, she received the hurling abuses on the telephone at her village Chamoli–Acts were neither proximate in time nor proximate in place–These were not of continuity either–Acts cannot be connected together as to form the same transaction on the facts of the case–Offence u/s. 376 could not have been tried by the Court at Chamoli.
