toto togel 4d situs toto togel situs togel slot deposit pulsa slot gacor 4d data keluaran hk

Vimla Verma (Smt.) vs. Sunil Verma & Anr.

50.00 5.00

Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Spread the knowledge

Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001–Sec. 9–Eviction–Objection by petitioner that she is the owner of premises and it was let out by her–Rejected–Petitioner has not produced any document or rent receipt to substantiate the fact that the premises was rented by her–Suit was filed by respondent H and it was decreed on the basis of compromise–Petitioner was not the party of eviction suit–Trial Court considered the fact that an FIR was lodged against the petitioner with the allegations of house trespass and theft of household articles wherein the police filed the challan against her–Suit premises had been sold by C to first respondent and his brother A–A filed the suit for eviction–Merely because a suit for partition was filed, the same cannot be a reason for raising the objection to the eviction decree granted by the Rent Tribunal–Tenant admitted in the reply of objection that the first respondent is the owner of premises and the rent of premises was paid to him–Held, no interference is called in the impugned order passed by the Tribunal.