Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 406, 420 & 120B–FIR–Declined to quash–Justification–No material to indicate that the appellants had any malafide intention against the respondent–Respondent filed three complaints regarding the MOU–Two simultaneous proceedings were initiated amounting to the abuse of process of Court–He did not disclose the facts of earlier two complaints in the present proceedings–Case of suppression of facts–he admitted that all the transactions took place in Delhi–Therefore, filing of the complaint in Calcutta is the way of harassing the appellant–Held, proceedings are liable to be quashed.
