Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 302, 460 & 147–Conviction–Sustainability–Circumstantial evidence–No allegation in FIR in regard to robbery–Recovery of articles is doubtful–It is not clear that why the investigation officer did not seize the shoes at the time of arrest, especially when the foot moulds of shoes had already been taken from the spot of occurrence–No specific evidence to prove the identity of appellants–Held, trial Court proceeded on the hypothesis and conjectures–Appellants are entitled to be acquitted.
