Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 420, 465, 469 & 471–Acquittal from the offence–Appreciation of–Trial Court meticulously examined the evidence brought on record and gave a definite finding through the reasoned order–Prosecution failed to prove the crucial fact that the objectionable line marked as G to H in the disputed document was inserted without the consent of the complainant–There was a consensus between the complainant and accused R regarding the rest of the ceiling on the common boundary wall–FSL report negates the allegations of complainant–Documents Ex. P/1 & P/2 were notary attested but the effort to examine the notray public was not made–Concurrent findings of Courts below–Interference declined.
