Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002–Auction of property–Petitioner is highest bidder–His contention that the immovable property was auctioned along with the machinery installed on it–Acceptability–Auction notice clearly shows that the stone crusher machine and its accessories have not been included in the auction–No material in support of the contention of petitioner that the bank official confirmed that the machinery was included as a part of the auction–Expression “As is where is”, “As is what is” and “whatever there is” is to be given plain and literal meaning–Petitioner failed to challenge the sale notice–Now, he is disentitled from seeking any relief by invoking the writ jurisdiction.
