Sub-letting–Findings of–Set aside by High Court–Appreciation of–Premises was rented to company for residential accommodation of its executive staff–Defendant No. 2 did not vacate the premise even after resigning the company–Trial Court hold him sub-tenant on the ground that the company
did not take any step to get back the possession–Whether proper ?–Held, no–Such in action would not by itself persuade to come on the conclusion that the sub-letting was proved–Held, High Court rightly interfered with the order of trial Court.
