Possession & Mesne Profit–Indian Succession Act, 1925–Sec. 63–Suit for possession and mesne profit–Decreed–Ground of appellant-defendants that the Will produced by the plaintiff was forged–Plaintiff examined one attesting witness of Will–Appellants did not challenge the Will by filing the separate suit–Even, the appellants were having any right over the property, they abandoned it because they were having the knowledge of Will before 15 years–No objection was taken by them on the act of receiving the rent by the plaintiff–Held, suit was rightly decreed.
