Employee’s Insurance Act, 1923–Secs. 3 & 30–Compensation–Justification for awarding–Specific contention of appellant Insurance Company that the deceased was not in the employment of respondent no. 4 and the cause of death was not an accident–Post mortem report showing that the deceased had died due to electric shock received from high tension line–Witness also supported this version–Further no contrary evidence could be produced by the claimants to show that the deceased was in the employment of respondent no. 4– Held, Commissioner was not justified in awarding the compensation and holding the Insurance Company liable for paying the same.
