Specific Relief Act, 1963–Sec. 6–Decree of possession–Revision against –Scope and limits for the exercise of the revisional jurisdiction against the judgment and decree passed u/s. 6 is limited to look into the propriety of the exercise of jurisdiction and not to re-appreciation of evidence–There is a bonafide claim of plaintiff-respondent to have title over the suit property–He asserted that he was in possession of property through his tenants–Therefore, no substances is found in the plea of petitioner that the plaintiff was not in the physical possession of the premises–Issue of benami transaction cannot be decided in a suit u/s. 6–Further, if the property is purchased for the benefit of the minor, can such property be disposed off in any manner without permission of the Court, would be decided in the appropriate suit–Interference declined.
