Code of Civil Procedure, 1908–Order 6, Rule 17–Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001–Sec. 9–Application by tenant-petitioner with stating that the landlord has acquired the other residential premises and his bonafide necessity is no more in existence–Dismissal of application–Admitted position that the alternative residential premises with the respondent-landlord was vacated during the eviction proceeding, however, the detail of the said premises have already been placed on the record by the petitioner in his written statement–Further, the respondent-landlord is the best judge to decide the convenience and suitability of the properties that are vested with him for his peaceful utilization of the said property and thus, the tenant cannot decide the same for the landlord or compel the landlord to use a particular property–Held, application was rightly dismissed.
