Permanent Injunction–Suit for–Dismissed–Plaintiff sought the right of easement in regard to the vacant land situated infront of his house–He admitted that the land belongs to Nagar Palika in the application under Order 41, Rule 27 whereas initially, he had claimed that the land has been allotted to C and he was not impleaded as the respondent party–Contradictory version–Admitted fact of encroachment by him–Held, suit was rightly dismissed.
