Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955–Secs. 88, 188, 183, 207 & 91–Suit for recovery of possession and injunction–Decreed–Findings were upheld by RAA–BOR reversed the judgment and decree–Justification–Concurrent findings of trial Court that the so-called sale deed was only an agreement to sale–It was neither registered nor sufficiently stamped–Case of plaintiff that the land was mortgaged for ten years and thereafter the defendants declined to handover the possession–Further, BOR wrongly placed the burden on plaintiff to prove the sale deed–Held, order passed by trial Court deserves to be restored.
