Indian Succession Act, 1925–Sec. 125–Alteration in the Will–Figure four was substituted by “three” and the name of respondent no. 1 was scored out–Testator appended his left thumb mark at the end of will–Will was typed whereas correction was made by the pen–No reason was shown for deleting the name of respondent no.1–Space between the last line of typed will and matter written by ball pen creates doubt–Held, High Court was justified in holding the respondent no. 1 entitled for share is property.
