Code of Civil Procedure, 1908–Order 26, Rule 10A–Application with
request of conducting DNA Test–Allowed by trial Court–Appreciation of–Dispute as regard to rights in coparcenary property–Plaintiffs are claiming theresaleves to be son and wife of respondent-defendant no. 1–DNA test is not only scientific but also more conclusive–It would avoid unnecessary harassment and embarrassment to the persons involved and would be more expedient in the facts of present case–Further, petitioners can not be permitted to challenge the order passed by trial Court, as they had not challengedthe issue already framed–Court is supposed to decide the concerned issue–Held, interference would not be justified in the impugned order.
