Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 499, 501, 354(A), 509, 506 & 504–Information Technology Act, 2000–Secs. 66 & 66(a), (b), (c)–FIR for the offence–Prayer for quashing–Prayer of the petitioner that the instant FIR is the counterblast to the FIR filed by his father-in-law–Declined to accept the prayer as the Investigation Agency has found the allegations established against the petitioner–Further, contention that he is the resident of United States for last about 11 years, also cannot be accepted, as the alleged offence can be committed without physical presence–Declined to quash the FIR.
