Partition–Decree of–Set aside by High Court–Hindu undivided Family–Existence of–Nothing on record to show that M and his sons constituted a HUF–Admission was with regard to a trading family and not HUF–From the recitals in the mortgage deed and averments in the written statement, it can
not be said that at the relevant period of time, the property was treated to be joint property–Some sale deeds indicate that the jointness of the property, if any had, ceased because of some family arrangements of partition–Plaintiffs took the advantage of Will of H and now they cannot be permitted to say that the Will is not valid–Agricultural land was also not joint–Held, no error is found in the findings of High Court.
