Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 399/402–Conviction–Sustainability–Case of prosecution that the police party was apprised about the committing of offence–However, neither any rojnamcha entry pertaining to the departure was made nor the significant information given by witness M was entered–Parcha
Kaymi also does not bear the signatures of this witness–Evidence of case revealing that the prosecution theory regarding the accused having been overheard by witness R while hatching a conspiracy to loot a bank is nothing but a sheer exaggeration–Conviction cannot be sustained.
