Penal Code, 1860–Sec. 468–Conviction–Appreciation of–Accused-petitioner admitted the fact that he fabricated the Ex. P/3–Amount of Rs. 3600.50 was written instead of Rs. 600.50 Both the documents were prepared by petitioner–Findings of Courts below were based on the ground of testimony of witnesses and FSL report–Handwriting expert was not required to be examined in view of circumstances of the case–Held, no infirmity, perversity or illegality is found in the impugned order.
