Limitation Act, 1963–Sec. 5–Respondent sought to raise the very same reason to condone the delay as were previously canvased, without placing any fresh or additional material to distinguish the current reason from the one already discussed and dismissed–Such a repetition of grounds already scrutinized and held untenable amounts to an abuse of the process of law–Although the applications for condonation of delay are filed under different mechanism and if the application filed under one provision has already been dismissed by a Court of competent jurisdiction by applying its judicial mind and held that the reasons for delay were not sufficient, a subsequent application filed under different provision reiterating the same contentions or grounds of delay cannot be entertained.
