Penal Code, 1860–Sec. 376–Prayer for quashing the charge–Declined by High Court–Justification–Contents of FIR and statements u/s. 164 reveal that the relationship between the parties was of a consensual nature and parties were in the relationship for about one and half years–Subsequently, the appellant expressed a disinclination to marry the second respondent which led to the registration of the FIR–Held, High Court was in error in declining to entertain the petition u/s. 482.
