Public Charity–Whether the temple is a public temple or private temple–Determination–Lack of pleadings in the plaint as to whether who constructed the temple–No evidence was adduced by the appellant-plaintiff that by which fund the temple was constructed–Two different pujaries performing
the seva-pooja of different idols in the premises–No blood relations between the successive pujaries–B was appointed as pujari by the SDM–Documents revealing that the inam rights were conferred on Mandir and not on the pujaries–Plaintiff himself got the land on lease from the Govt. and deposited
certain amount–Suit lands were in name of temple–Held, first appellate Court rightly concluded that the temple was a public temple.
