toto togel 4d situs toto togel situs togel slot deposit pulsa slot gacor 4d data keluaran hk

Shiv Narain vs. Board of Revenue for Rajasthan & Anr.

40.00 4.00

Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Spread the knowledge

Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955–Sec. 212–Appointment of receiver–Legal aspects–Appointment of receiver cannot be ordered merely because there are conflciting claims to the property–Party applying for appointment of receiver must show some emergency or danger or the loss likely to be caused demanding immediate action–In the instant case, both the parties are occupying the lands and they are residing in the houses constructed thereon without their being any material showing that there exists some emergency or danger or there is likelihood of loss being caused to the property–Merely on the basis of FIR lodged in remote past by the rival parties on account of some dispute having arisen, could not have been made basis for appointment of receiver–BOR rightly set aside the order of RAA.