Criminal Trial–Motive–Establishment–Allegation that the appellant was under the obligation to make the payment to the deceased–Witness did not elaborate on any transaction between the deceased and appellant–Payment was to be made by H in a sale transaction of sheep and goats–Appellant stood as a guarantor in this transaction–Natural course of action for getting the payment would have been to approach to H initially and not the alleged guarantor–Theory of motive is not substantiated with the evidence as the evidence is contradictory and unreliable.
