Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988–Sec. 7 & 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2)–Whether in absence of evidence of complainant / direct or primary evidence of demand of illegal gratification, it is permissible to draw an inferential deduction or culpability/guilt of a public servant u/s. 7 & 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2) based on other evidence adduced by the prosecution ? –Held, yes.
