Contract Law–Indian Succession Act, 1925–Contract between the father of petitioner and respondent could not be completed due to civil litigation in regard to property–Petitioner never applied for refund of earnest money during the long period of 20 years–Market value of material has been increased and State would suffer huge loss–The law of Contract does not provide for any kind of succession rights for the purpose of performance of contract unless there is some specific stipulation regarding the same–Performance of contract does not have any privity between the petitioner and respondents–Interference declined.
