Partition–Suit for–Plaintiff-respondent came with the case that the share of the appellant was transferred by his legal guardian for legal necessity–On the day of sale, appellant was minor–Appellant was not made party in partition suit initially but was impleaded as the second respondent when he filed the application for impleadment–Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of plaintiff– Justification–Burden to prove the fact that the property was sold by legal guardian for the legal necessity–Whether could be fastened on the appellant?–Held, no–Burden was on the plaintiff.
