Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988–Sec. 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2)–Order of framing the charge–Justification–No work of complainant was pending with the petitioner on the relevant date of making a complaint or effecting trap against another accused–No evidence to show that the money paid to co-accused was the money of gratification–Neither the statements of complainant nor the statements of co-accused R or any other evidence show that there was a prior meeting of minds of two accused persons to attract the offence of criminal liability–Case of the petitioner that the complainant had distant relations with him due to non-refund of borrowed money–Complaint was made beyond the jurisdictional office of ACD–Impugned order of framing the charge is liable to be set aside.
