Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 304-B & 498-A–Acquittal from the offence–Revision by the complainant–Delay in lodging the FIR–No satisfactory explanation–No evidence on record to show that the accused made any demand of dowry before or after the marriage–PW 1 admitted that his daughter demanded the money for business–Deceased was found 100% burned and her statement could not be completed before the Magistrate–Doctor certified that she was not in a fit state to make the statements–Oral statement made before PW 3 & PW 7 was rightly discarded by the Court below–Merely because the accused failed to give the explanation u/s. 313 Cr.P.C., the prosecution cannot get any benefit–Version of defence witnesses that the conduct of the accused was not harassing with the deceased to commit suicide–Re-appreciation of evidence is not permissible in the revisional jurisdiction–Interference declined.
