Puran Mal & Ors. vs. The Judge, Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Ajmer & Anr.

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947–Secs. 25-F, 25-G & 25-H–Rejection of reference–Petitioners never proved 240 days of service–Provisions of Sec. 25-F do not come into play–Petitioners neither proved continuous service nor retention of juniors–Respondents showed that only those daily wagers who had completed 240 days were regularized–Therefore, Sec. 25-G also cannot come into play–Right u/s. 25-H is confined to retrenched workman and not to others–Petitioners raised the dispute after a long unexplained delay–Held, no case is made out for interference.