Hindu Marriage Act, 1956–Sec. 13-B–Family Courts Act, 1984–Sec. 10–Code of Civil Procedure, 1908–Order 3, Rule 2–Father of petitioner was declined to allow to represent him as being the power of attorney holder–Justification–Divorce proceedings with the mutual consent of parties–Respondent has no objection if the father is allowed–Genuine representation of parties through the close relations can be allowed–Held, Family Court is directed to allow the father of petitioner to participate in the proceedings.
