Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 376 & 511–Conviction–Sustainability–Variance between statements and medical evidence as regards to time of sustaining injuries by prosecutrix–Child sleeping with prosecutrix was alleged to be wake up but he was not examined by prosecution–Record of case revealing that there was a dispute between the parties in regard to land–Fact that the appellant run away by jumping on his roof is found contrary to mauka naksha–Held, trial Court did not appreciate the evidence properly–Conviction deserves to be set aside.
