Code of Civil Procedure, 1908–Sec. 100–Suit for possession, declaration, and permanent injunction–Dismissed–First appeal was also dismissed–Findings were reversed by High Court–Justification–Plaintiff himself admitted the fact that the appellants purchased the suit property from G and they were in possession of the property–View of first appellate Court that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief sought–High Court appreciated the evidence like to first appeal and reversed the findings–Not permissible–No substantial question of law was involved in the second appeal–Held, High Court was not justified in interfering in the findings of first appellate Court.
