Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973–Secs. 438, 439 & 70–Earlier the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by High Court–At the time of filing challan, he was released on regular bail–Subsequently, High Court cancelled the order of anticipatory bail–On the next date of hearing, trial Court cancelled the bail and issued the warrants of arrest–Whether proper ?–Held, no–No notice or information was given to petitioner before passing the order–Information was necessary in view of the fact that the trial Court itself granted the regular bail and the accused was to appear on the date already fixed by trial Court–Further, the trial Court lost the sight that once the accused had granted the liberty of bail and there was no breach/violation of that order–Held, the impugned order deserves to be quashed and set aside.
