Hindu Succession Act, 1955–Secs. 6/14–Code of Civil Procedure,1908–Order 39, Rules 1 & 2–On the death of S, there was a notional partition of the coparcenary property and his widow got an intestate succession along with her sons and daughters–She was in possession of property–She was an absolute owner of property by virtue of Sec. 14 and was having the right to transfer the same in favour of anyone–Further, the property had already disrupted before she executed the deed of relinquishment in respect of her absolute property–Once the share of coparcenary was defined by a preliminary decree, actual division of property by metes and bounds was not necessary to operate as embargo on the rights of a female heir to transfer her rights, title and interest in the property–Plaintiff failed to establish the prima facie case for granting the temporary injunction–Prayer was rightly rejected.
