Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B–FIR for the offence–Prayer for quashing–Petitioner executed the agreement in favour of complainant introducing himself as the sole owner of the property in question as relinquish deed had been executed by the other share holders and he received the major portion of sale consideration–Complainant has been declared entitled to get executed the sale deed in his favour in the suit of specific performance–In the suit filed by other share holders for declaration of relinquish deed null and void, he did not disclose the fact of pendency of suit for specific performance–In the proceedings u/s. 90-A of Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, fact of pendency of legal proceedings was not disclosed–These facts raises a finger of suspicion towards his ill intention–It is not a fit case warranting the interference u/s. 482.
