Indian Succession Act, 1925–Sec. 63–Will–Suspicious circumstance–Non-mention of the status of 1st respondent as the wife of the testator and failure of give reasons for her disinheritance–Will is completely silent with regard to the existence of these facts–First respondent was residing with the testator till his death–Nothing on record to show the relation between the couple was bitter–She was nominated by the testator and she was entitled to receive his pension which demonstrates the testator’s conduct in accepting her as his lawfully wedded wife–Trial Court wrongfully observed that non-performance of last rites of the testator by 1st respondent hinted at sour relations between the couple–Non-mention of 1st respondent or the reasons for her disinheritance in the Will, is an eloquent reminder that the free disposition of the testator was vitiated by the undue influence of the appellant–No interference is required in the impugned judgment.
