Gupta Sales Corporation vs. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commisison & Ors.

Consumer Protection Act, 1986–Secs.12 & 2(r)–Unfair trade practice–Case of supply of low standard tiles/adhesive–Name of the manufacturer was not mentioned by the petitioner-trader–No objection was filed by him at the time of appointment of Commissioner for inspection–Further, he failed to remain present despite of re-scheduled program of inspection–He nowhere explained that which laboratory is appropriate laboratory for examination of the tiles/adhesive–Matter relates to unfair trade practice–District Forum was competent to try the case–No case is made out for interference.