Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923–Sec. 30–Concurrent findings of Commissioner in regard to disability sustained by claimants–High Court dealt with the appeal and modified the extent of disability for the purpose of computation of compensation–Justification–Percentage of permanent
disability needs to be assessed only by a qualified medical practitioner–If is purely a question of fact–Enactment restricts the scope of appeal only to the substantial question of law–High Court was not within competence in disturbing the findings as it was not a case of no evidence or perverse findings–Impugned judgment of High Court set aside and order passed by commissioner restored.
Golla Rajanna Etc. Etc. vs. The Divisional Manager & Anr. Etc. Etc. – (SC)
₹36.00 ₹3.60


