Code of Civil Procedure, 1908–Order 37–Recovery of money–Suit for–Decreed–Commercial transaction between the parties–Plaintiff discharged his burden to prove that through the indent (Ex. 1), the defendant ordered for purchase the goods and these were delivered through Ex. 2 & Ex 3–Bills of sold goods were also proved–Mere denial by the defendant is not suffice to disbelieve the statements of PW 1 & PW 2–Plaintiff proved that the goods were received by the son of defendant–Merely non-mentioning the name of son of plaintiff who delivered the goods cannot be a ground to disbelieve the evidence of PW 1 & PW 2–Defendant’s signature on Ex. 1 were found genuinue–Held, suit was rightly decreed.
