Code of Civil Procedure, 1908–Order 37–Suit for recovery of money–Decreed by High Court–Plea of appellant that the document relied on High Court was a photostat copy and was not admissible in evidence–Plaintiff argued that the original was with the purchaser of property–This fact was not denied by appellant–Argument of appellant is not substantial–Further, argument that the transaction was benami, could not be proved by him–Held, suit was rightly decreed.
Fair Communication & Consultants & Anr. vs. Surendra Kerdile – (SC)
₹42.00 ₹4.20


