Permanent Injunction–Suit for–Dismissal of–Claim of plaintiff that the land in question was set apart for public use by defendant-Municipality–Specific denial by defendant from the fact–Conclusion of trial Court was based on the report of Commissioner–Appellants failed to produce any evidence in
rebuttal thereof–Out of four plaintiff’s only two filed the appeal against the verdict of trial Court which shows that most of plaintiff’s before the trial Court realized the futility of their actions–Appeal deserves to be dismissed for lack of substantial question of law.
