Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955–Sec. 232–Judgment passed by BOR–Sustainability–View of BOR that the suit was decided after giving the proper opportunity of leading the evidence–This fact is not discernible from the mere reading of the order sheets–BOR did not consider the circumstances under which the statement was made on behalf of Tehsildar–Misreading of note-sheets by BOR–No other reason was assigned by BOR for setting aside the judgment & decree–Impugned judgment suffers from perversity, patent illegality of misreading of order sheets–Set aside and matter remanded back to BOR for deciding afresh.
