toto togel 4d situs toto togel situs togel slot deposit pulsa slot gacor 4d data keluaran hk

Chain Singh Gehlot vs. Sushila Parihar

50.00 5.00

Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Spread the knowledge

Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001–Sec. 9(1)–Eviction by Appellate Tribunal on the ground of personal and bonafide necessity–Respondent-landlord is a widow lady having three children, out of which one girl child is unmarried and is pursuing her studies–She has made out a case that on account of the death of her husband, she has no source of income and in order to sustain herself and her children, premises in dispute is required for running the business of artificial jewellary–Even if the alternative premises are available, then also it is for her to choose a more suitable premises for carrying on the business–Petitioner cannot dictate as to from premises, she should start the business–Petitioner is not able to demonstrate the extreme hardship caused to him upon vacating the premises in dispute–Litigation consumed ten years–Held, the impugned order passed by Appellate Tribunal does not warrant any interference.