Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985–Secs. 8/18 r/w. 8/29–Order of framing the charge–Sustainability–Allegation that the main accused K purchased the contraband from P–No direct material to show that the petitioner is the same person which he came from the statement of K–Moreover, the statements of K in police custody, recorded u/s. 27 of the Evidence Act are not admissible in the evidence–Trial Court completely ignored the lack of evidence–Impugned order is liable to be set aside.
