Specific Relief Act, 1963–Sec. 6–Dismissal of the suit–Justification–Defendants no. 1 specifically admitted that the construction was made within a period of six months prior to filing the suit–Patta was issued in name of brother H of the parties and same was not controverted by any of the parties–It is also admitted that the plaintiff B has the plot in the eastern side of the land–PW 2 is nephew of both parties and he substantiated the possession of plaintiff B–Raising of construction just prior to filing the suit is evident from the interim order passed by this Court–It is clear that plaintiff was in possession of the suit land in April, 2002 and he was illegally dispossesed–Suit deserves to be decreed.
