Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973–Sec. 146(1)–Delivery of possession–Appreciation of–Conclusion of SDM that the respondents were in possession of the land prior to two months of attachment–Evidence of petitioner’s witness was not found consistent–Witness R stated that the possession of land was with respondents–Further, the witnesses of respondent were not crossexamined by the petitioner–Held, impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.
